Evaluating Bias Mitigation Techniques in Credit and Marketing Models: Balancing Fairness and Performance

Sai Prashanth Pathi

doi:10.71097/IJAIDR.v16.i2.1661

Evaluating Bias Mitigation Techniques in Credit and Marketing Models: Balancing Fairness and Performance

Author(s)	Sai Prashanth Pathi
Country	United States
Abstract	Algorithmic decision making in financial services often amplifies existing societal biases due to imbalanced data and historical discrimination. Ensuring fairness in machine learning models, particularly within credit scoring and marketing domains, is therefore both an ethical and regulatory imperative. This paper presents a comprehensive empirical evaluation of prominent bias mitigation techniques using both pre-processing and post-processing methods from Fairlearn and AIF360 frameworks. Using four benchmark datasets Synthetic, German Credit, Bank Marketing, and Credit Card Default, we analyze fairness across protected attributes such as gender, age, and marital status. Models including Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest (RF) serve as baselines, while bias mitigation is applied using Exponentiated Gradient Reduction, Threshold Optimization, Reweighing, and Equalized Odds Postprocessing. Performance is evaluated across metrics including AUC, Accuracy, Disparate Impact (DI), Demographic Parity (DP_diff), and Equalized Odds (EO_diff) differences. Results show that while mitigation methods consistently reduce bias metrics (DP_diff, EO_diff, DI) across all datasets, they incur a minimal performance cost (average AUC drop less than 1.5%). AIF360 Reweighing and Fairlearn Threshold Optimizer are shown to achieve the best overall fairness–performance balance, with method effectiveness being highly dependent on the type of inherent data bias. The findings highlight the importance of contextual bias measurement and dataset specific fairness strategies in responsible AI deployment for financial decision making.
Keywords	Fairness in Machine Learning; Bias Mitigation; Credit Scoring; Responsible AI; Fairlearn; AIF360; Financial Decision Models.
Field	Engineering
Published In	Volume 16, Issue 2, July-December 2025
Published On	2025-12-18
Cite This	Evaluating Bias Mitigation Techniques in Credit and Marketing Models: Balancing Fairness and Performance - Sai Prashanth Pathi - IJAIDR Volume 16, Issue 2, July-December 2025. DOI 10.71097/IJAIDR.v16.i2.1661
DOI	https://doi.org/10.71097/IJAIDR.v16.i2.1661
Short DOI	https://doi.org/hbkqrp

View / Download PDF File

doi

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJAIDR DOI prefix is
10.71097/IJAIDR

Downloads

Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 16 Isu 2 Cover Page Vol 16 Isu 1 Cover Page Vol 15 Isu 2

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA

About IJAIDR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us	Message on WhatsApp	+91-9687-182-185	editor@ijaidr.com

Journal of Advances in Developmental Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Evaluating Bias Mitigation Techniques in Credit and Marketing Models: Balancing Fairness and Performance

Share this